PANGERAN.ORG

Today I rechecked this blog at W3C Validator.

Unfortunately I did not passed the validator! It said to me, well it’s a text actually and sound like this.

This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict!

Failed validation, 12 Errors

So this post is actually for testing purpose. But you can read it too as this is not as useless as what it suppose to be.

Why we should validate?

1. Cross browser compatible.
2. Compatible for future browser.

Why validate is hard?

• Even _target blank attribute is not allowed.
  For my case which I use strict doctype.
  It still valid if you use transitional doctype. So don’t worry too much.
• All styling is depends on stylesheet.
  If you lack of css knowledge like me, you’ll have a hard time like me too.

Validate is a must and a challage for all web designer. A valid page also crawled and spidered easier than unvalid page. - Source; unverified

This is a valid video flash embed.

This is a valid iframe code for strict doctype!

A valid xhtml always use lower character for the code snippset.

Then I check this post’s code via direct input.
Yesss!
I’ve passes with the validator with no errors nor warnings.(For now…)
As the time goes by, you might easily make mistake and lazy. So do I. He he. :-p

This Page Is Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict!

Passed validation

See next page for the valid youtube video code or a valid iframe code.

Read the rest of this entry »

Popularity: 25% [?]